"Even if there was absolute evidence pointing to prior conditions that
existed - the fact is he was in a University. He wasn't in High School
or a Middle School. He was in an institution of Higher Education."
I'm assuming you mean that he should have just kept on going if he was just fine in elementary and middle school and high school? Or did you mean that you doubt that he was autistic since he was in an institutute of Higher Education? If its the later, then check out
www.templegrandin.com . She is autistic but she's a phd and has written stuff and been on Rosie O'Donnel's show recently. If you mean the first, then let me say that it is possible to go on for years, more than 10 years, possibly until you are 50, until you are finally diagnosed
correctly. And it is also possible to have a dual diagnosis. I don't understand why all the professionals are trying to call him one thing. Cho may have had a couple of things on him, which may have caused the increased frustration/violent outbreak. Also, with several mental disorders, it is not noticed until you get to your adolescence or your young adult age, which Cho showed evidence of as well. From what I've read, he wasn't coping well in society from about middle school on and quite possibly from before. So I don't understand what you mean when you say "the fact is he was in a University."
And its not "mentally handicapped" if you are talking about disorders like schizophrenia and bipolar. Those are are mental illnesses; its a biological/chemical thing. And, i think, they were thinking autism was too, but dont quote me on that one. It's been awhile since I was into the subject.
I don't t
...[Message truncated]