Entertainment

Message Board

    • Topic: 
    • Anyone else see the irony?
  • From: JustTheFacts17
  •   To: All
  • 1 of 49
  • 6/13/05
in how the jurists were quick to "convict" the mothers of the children who allowed their sons to sleep with Michael Jackson but then failed to convict him of sleeping with their children?
  • From: lackofsense
  •   To: All
  • 2 of 49
  • 6/13/05
And there are some who wonder why more people dont come forward.
  • From: JustTheFacts17
  •   To: All
  • 3 of 49
  • 6/13/05
And there are some who wonder why more people dont come forward. ================= I don't...not for a minute....
  • From: ncclt
  •   To: All
  • 4 of 49
  • 6/13/05
Like I sad they are in aw by him. These are not very educated women or have a sum of money. Please keep your children at home if you are so worried about them...
  • From: lackofsense
  •   To: All
  • 5 of 49
  • 6/13/05
I know. It is hard to watch and think that more children will probably be victimized as a result of this outcome.
  • From: Alien_nails
  •   To: All
  • 6 of 49
  • 6/13/05
more children will probably be victimized as a result of this outcome. the ONLY children victimized are the children of that money grubing w***e. There were NO VICTEMS, the jury has said so. If people have to accept that Scott Peaterson killed his wife with no eye witness and not a shred of credible physical evidence, then believe THIS jury got it RIGHT.
  • From: JrsyGrl99
  •   To: All
  • 7 of 49
  • 6/14/05
There were NO VICTEMS, the jury has said so. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The jury did not say that. They said there wasn't enough evidence to support it.
  • From: Alien_nails
  •   To: All
  • 8 of 49
  • 6/14/05
The jury did not say that. They said there wasn't enough evidence to support it. Oh yeah. So, I guess all those atheist are just flat wrong. Thanks for pointing that out. Just because there is no hard evidents to prove there is a God, he still exist even if SOME people do not believe it. Same with extrarerrestials. No hard evidence, but what the heck. They exist. I guess the Commander in Chump was right. There were WMD. No can can find them, or even evidence of them. But, hey, they existed. I guess they are hid under some 23rd century cloaking device. No victems, the man is INNOCENT. And that IS the way the books will say it.
  • From: celtic_blues
  •   To: All
  • 9 of 49
  • 6/13/05
in how the jurists were quick to "convict" the mothers of the children who allowed their sons to sleep with Michael Jackson but then failed to convict him of sleeping with their children? *************************************** sad isn't it? and you think he will change his ways? nope!
  • From: Nelbrewster
  •   To: All
  • 10 of 49
  • 6/13/05
Sleeping with a child or anyone else is not a crime! It used to be quite common and still is acceptable throughout many parts of the world. Ever gone camping? bed or no bed, what's the difference?
  • From: celtic_blues
  •   To: All
  • 11 of 49
  • 6/13/05
Sleeping with a child or anyone else is not a crime! It used to be quite common and still is acceptable throughout many parts of the world. Ever gone camping? bed or no bed, what's the difference? ****************************************** don't ever complain about a perp case again Nell. you want to excuse Michael but ot others? how hypocritical. don't be stupid by using camping as an example.
  • From: abbyr311
  •   To: All
  • 12 of 49
  • 6/13/05
What is a "perp case"? And what do you mean by "excuse Michael but ot others"? What does "ot" mean? Nelbrewster's point is accurate and well-taken. In many parts of the world sharing a bed does not have nefarious conotations.
  • From: celtic_blues
  •   To: All
  • 13 of 49
  • 6/13/05
What is a "perp case"? And what do you mean by "excuse Michael but ot others"? What does "ot" mean? Nelbrewster's point is accurate and well-taken. In many parts of the world sharing a bed does not have nefarious conotations. ********************************************* sharing your bed and having to pay off victims? you Michael supporters are nuts. and in other parts of the world people sleep with many children all the time? pleeeeeeasse!
  • From: librepub__
  •   To: All
  • 14 of 49
  • 6/14/05
sharing your bed and having to pay off victims? you Michael supporters are nuts. and in other parts of the world people sleep with many children all the time? pleeeeeeasse! ==================================== actually in many cultures a communal bed is common... It used to be quite common in this country...
  • From: girlno3
  •   To: All
  • 15 of 49
  • 6/13/05
yeah showering with little boys isnt illegal either, sigh... actually in most other countries of the world, things probably would not have been this good for jackson...think of it, the middle east where they have call to prayer 6 times a day? muslims who won't wear perfume becasue it is considered too 'sexual'? many countries are much more conservative, women are not allowed to wear revealing clothing, if they do they are considered cheap... if you arent covered to the ankles and the wrists, people will stare and think of you as being cheap... gods and the camping example IS stupid what the hel? why dont all jackson supporters jsut sign up for N a-mBLa now... for some reason this site is censoring this acronym...
  • From: togetwater
  •   To: All
  • 16 of 49
  • 6/14/05
are you really that ignorant, that you cant tell the difference in camping and sleeping a grown mans bed ?you and mj should go to the parts of the world were this is acceptable
  • From: borrego97
  •   To: All
  • 17 of 49
  • 6/13/05
As one juror said on Larry King tonight, he believes that MJ did molest some boys, but the prosecution did not provide evidence beyond a reasonable doubt! This defends my point that MJ is not innocent, just lucky that he was able to hide hard evidence. We haven't seen the last of Mr. Sneddon vs. MJ.
  • From: Alien_nails
  •   To: All
  • 18 of 49
  • 6/13/05
As one juror said on Larry King tonight, he believes that MJ did molest some boys, but the prosecution did not provide evidence beyond a reasonable doubt! And the oprative word is BELIEVE. It was what THAT juror believed. But in true hypocritical fashion, if this juror said HE BELIEVED he knew the truth about Micheal Jackson because he was abducted by a UFO, you certainly would not believe him then. Micheal JacksonIS INNOCENT. He was not proven guilty. Believe, innuendo, rumor, conjecture dose not and did not create truth here, the facts did, and he WALKS. He goes home, and not to any prison. So just accept that.
  • From: izzy_the_cat
  •   To: All
  • 19 of 49
  • 6/14/05
I totally agree brit_man. It is quite clear that a number of witness had been got to and the family has been made to look like a bunch of money grabbing scumbags. Hell thats what the defense team have been paid millons to do. How they sleep at night knowing what they've done is beyond me. I have never been a great lover of the way americans do things and this is definatly another money over matter case. For gods sake when people were reliving the moments when mj molested them the jury were chatting and laughing with each other like it was a tv show.. I was not in the court room but after reading many different eyewitness accounts they all stated this and I think its disgusting. This would never be allowed to be turned into a media circus in the uk. We protect our children, we have respect and morals all things that make me very glad I live in a RESPECTABLE country..
  • From: borrego97
  •   To: All
  • 20 of 49
  • 6/14/05
I agree, but you can't get through to the MJ supporters because they have their minds made up. To back up my point again, more jurors today, on Goodmorning America, believe Micael Jackson is guilty of molesting children, but they were not allowed to find guilt on the sole testimonies of other victims.
 
 
  ©  Mzinga, Inc. All Rights Reserved.