>>I just would like the same logical consideration be applied regarding Bush/Iraq/WMDs where it was  a
political ploy advocated by the Democrats, funded by the Soros types and carried out by the MSM.
People... have a little more consideration of the truth for Obama/WHO etc., then you showed Bush,et.al.!



That would almost make sense if Obama wanted to launch a pre-emptive strike on Mexico,
kill tens of thousands of Mexicans, spend hundreds of billions of dollars (including
billions in no-bid contracts to Joe Biden's company -- which installs faulty wiring that electrocutes our troops),
and get thousands of US servicemen killed fighting an enemy that had nothing to do with 9/11.

but he doesn't.

>>You have proven you are a bigoted

I have?  what exactly is that?


>>You have totally ignored 13 UN resolutions

That's hilarious.
Well, if the UN's opinion suddenly matters to you, do you also agree with them that the Iraq War was illegal?
 


>>So what is the problem?  The 12 deaths are less then what happens in the US and President Bush is at fault?

no.  Halliburton is Dick Cheney's company.

And it's good to know that if Joe Biden's company ever electrocutes US soldiers to death, you'll be there to defend him.   (as long as he kills what you consider to be a reasonable number)


>>My point of the comparison which you utterly failed was give Obama the benefit of the doubt which evidently
doesn't apply to Bush who had 1,000s of human intelligence support, millions of documents,


Well, now Obama has those millions of documents,
so by your logic, you have to give him the benefit of the doubt about everything.
So you are no longer allowed to criticize him.

on the bright side, that'll free up about 15 or 16 hours a day for you...