Email This Message
Topic 
E-Mail AddressesSeparate multiple addresses with commas 
CommentsAdd your own comments (if any)
  • From: grant_1921
  •   To: All
  • 36 of 36
  • 4/1/07
I'm not up to par these days. But, I just read Howard has stalled both, the paternity test case and Daniel's inquiry. I gotta ask... If he is so sure of his paternity, why doesn't he just get it over with? Why hold on to a child that isn't his? And... Daniel's inquiry is NOT a murder trial, and Stern has not been charged with anything. So, why is HE challenging the sitting of a jury to conduct the inquest? Doesn't he want to know how Daniel died? Wouldn't Anna want to know, if she were alive? **************************************** you have to ask yourself, if Anna was still alive do you think Howard would be stalling Daniel's inquest? I don't, so for him to do this now is rather stupid. true, this is not a criminal case so why is Howard doing this?