Email This Message
Topic 
E-Mail AddressesSeparate multiple addresses with commas 
CommentsAdd your own comments (if any)
  • From: refuge51
  •   To: All
  • 17 of 166
  • 4/4/07
No, nothing of his was taken, it was things of Anna's and from what was said last night Stern cannot sue for her things missing. Whoever is the father can because it belongs to Danielynn. From what was said too what is in the house of Anna's belongs to her estate so wonder how much Stern has sold for money since he needs it so bad. The thing is if he had clean hands in all of this, people would not be saying things about him. He obviously he is guilty or it would not bother him. What is that saying, sticks and stones.... =================================== You don't have one inkling of facts do you? Yes they belonged to Anna, now Dannielynn. Howard as guardian of the child has every right to do what he can legally to get those items back. Howard has not made one penny off anna that hasn't been put into the trust fund for Dannielynn. Get off your high horse, he also doesn't owe you or me an explanation of diddly squat. Howard is the only one of the three that knows when to shut his mouth. Did you know the nannies who lied about Anna and Howard have retracted their statements and have attorneys who will make it be known who offerred them money to tell lies? See, the truth is always gonna come out.