>"He is an agnostic atheist.  A smart one at that --
      An agnostic is one who believes it impossible to know anything about God or about the creation of the universe ..."<
-----------

Sounds to me that Dawkins is taking the ignostic position, which is the one I graduated to.

--- also from Wikipedia (ignosticism):
The view that a coherent definition of God must be presented before the question of the existence of god can be meaningfully discussed. Furthermore, if that definition is unfalsifiable, the ignostic takes the theological noncognitivist position that the question of the existence of God (per that definition) is meaningless. In this case, the concept of God is not considered meaningless; the term "God" is considered meaningless.