Email This Message
Topic
E-Mail Addresses
Separate multiple addresses with commas
Comments
Add your own comments (if any)
From:
grant_1921
To:
All
10 of 20
3/30/07
Apparently the funeral rights ....the baby got the money not him. Actually i didnt know he was always out there i thought he was locked in that house apart from for court appearances. But soon as they said this come under British laws it was obvious what would happen. To us ppl are inncoent until proven otherwise. Its the way our laws work and no way in hell could ppl who present our programmes say the kind of things yours do without being sued. Our forums too we cant put what ive seen on tmz for eg...our accounts would get banned instantly. Sites like Tmz i think are disgusting. We dont really have anything like that and it doesnt seem to care if things are true just about how trashy it can be. If hes responsible for killing either Anna Nicole or Daniel..or even remotely respsonsible for there deaths he should receive the highest penalty. But now and its a big but even if the inquest is held hw woudl probably get away with it for the simple fact whats been said about him. *************************************** he was out there, most people in mourning go into seclusion not have exclusive interviews right after their supposingly loved one's death. our laws work the same way but their is also public opinion which there will always be. I couldn't defend a man who knows this isn't his baby and wants to deny the real father his rights.
Send
Cancel